Owing to his interest in Christianity and God, he decided to study the Philosophy of Religion course at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Chicago. At least youre not blind! According to divine command theory God allows necessary evil as a part of His plan and whatever God commands must be the morally correct course of action. As we have seen, Craig's other four arguments do not stand the test of rigorous logic or factuality and three of them yield nothing more than bland theistic deities, while the fourth is circular and it relies on assumptions that the Bible's depiction of the events surrounding Jesus' crucifixion, death, and resurrection are historically accurate. Physical models of a beginning-less universe do exist; for instance, the theoretical physicist, Professor Christof Wetterich of the Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Heidelberg has such a model. [21]:154[22]:107, In October 2015, Professor Vilenkin discusses the BGV theorem, mentioning Dr. Craig by name, with respect to the existence of God stating, "What causes the universe to pop out of nothing? See other industries within the Health Care and Social Assistance sector: Child Care Services , Community Food and Housing, and Emergency and Other Relief Services , Continuing Care Retirement Communities and Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly , General Medical and Surgical Hospitals , Home Health Care Services , Individual and Family Services , Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing . He obtained a PhD in Philosophy from the prestigious University of Birmingham, England, in the year 1977. An entertaining and instructive exchange unfolds between William Lane Craig and Ken Ham, the leader of Answers in Genesis. This is the height of intellectual dishonesty because: It's well worth checking out each and every quote Craig dishes out in his name-dropping spree as he quote mines and cherry picks extensively. So, Craig claims to prove the existence of God by invoking the resurrection of Jesus, which is itself explained by presuming that God exists to supernaturally resurrect Jesus. Here, Carrier had prepared a scathing criticism of this key claim in Craig's argument for the resurrection by picking apart Habermas' methodology, but Craig simply replied that he was relying on Kremer, not Habermas as if just bantering Kremer's name about made the claim about scholarly consensus self-evidently true and unassailable. Craig is a Professional Philosopher. In a brilliant example of projection, Craig adds insult to injury by claiming that the reason others don't accept his arguments for God's existence must be that they are intellectually dishonest: So even for some other Christians, Craig's argument is problematic because of its reliance on the Holy Spirit, since not all Christians believe in the Holy Spirit (nontrinitarians, such as Oneness Pentecostalism and Mormonism). Indeed, this lack of detail in his initial arguments allows him to present qualifications for them after his opponents have presented counterarguments. [3] However, this is more about crafting a more effective "sales pitch" than any real commitment to reason, since Craig is essentially willing to abandon reason if it provides the "wrong" answers (i.e. Dont listen to those who say that God answers your prayers only through miracles. "Neo-Lorentzianism" is needed for the A-theory of time to be correct. 2. Good on him for attempting to falsify any and all explanations given. (Craig's opinion is that the Canaanites had it coming, but that PTSD among the Israelite fighters is a bit of a worry.)[85]. That was why, when Christopher Hitchens in our debate at Biola University said to me, Well, what Christian view do you think is false? Comprehensive company profiles. Indeed, he explicitly acknowledges that a beginning in one type of time doesn't imply a beginning in the other. By contrast, I think my Calvinistic brethren are probably largely already regenerate Christians. This is of course tied to the "partisan problem" since it appears that some of Craig's fans are very diligent in monitoring his Wikipedia page. Rather, it was a way of asking the question, How can there be one thing one being that has three centers of self-consciousness and yet is still one thing? And the analogy of Cerberus came to mind. Dynamic search and list-building capabilities. This presupposition puts God into the premise of the argument that was supposed to prove his existence in the first place. Craig has worked as the President of several philosophical societies like the Evangelical Philosophical Society, Philosophy of Time Society etc. Craig was taken to task for this by Yuri Balashov & Michael Janssen, in some historically contingent circumstances, The Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are without error or misstatement, speaking to a very devoutly Christian audience, God's existence is used to explain the resurrection, not really, as Craig himself admits(! Is William Lane Craig Incompetent or Dishonest? - Reddit There are two assumptions assumed in this argument. Lets apply the logic to the problem. An analogy would be to claim that since a monarch is defined as the offspring of another monarch, the only possible explanations are either the obviously false one that monarchs and monarchies are eternal or that there must have been some mystical divine prime mover behind their origins. Demonstrating that a god is a necessary condition for objective morality requires either one or more a priori arguments to discredit the various alternatives. He has proposed a controversial Neo-Apollonarian Christology. So I think there really is room for this philosophical mindset that he describes in doing a good hermeneutical approach to Scripture. I don't see a good way of preserving the unity of Christ's person and the distinctness of his natures apart from this sort of proposal. I was finding that even with my contact lenses, my reading was seriously impaired and driving was difficult. Craig is basically coupling Paleys old obvious design argument with the kind of presuppositionalist "I'm right by definition" (a.k.a. Dr. Craig is in good spirits and is grateful for your love and prayers.. At age 16, while a junior in high school, he first heard the message of the Christian gospel and yielded his life to Christ. Transcript of the 2011 Is the Foundation of Morality Natural or Supernatural? William Lane Craig | Biography, Philosophy and Facts - Famous Philosophers As sinners meriting only the justice and wrath of God, we have been saved solely by His good grace. Theology professor and author Kenneth Keathley took to Twitter last Friday to announce that 72-year-old Craig had been hospitalized with COVID-19. ), an argument at all, only seem to pay any mind at all to the laws and limitations of physics when (they think) these, written God into one of the premises in an argument that is supposed to demonstrate God's existence, which is simpler and works completely fine by itself. Although Craig defends Scripture in some areas, he adamantly denies literal (6-day) creation in favor of the big bang and secular timescale. The Craig-Washington Debate, Did Jesus of Nazareth Rise from the Dead? Reasonable Faith, the ministry that Craig oversees, reported on Twitter on Sunday afternoon that Craig was doing better and would likely be discharged from the hospital soon. 2. YouTube) to gauge public opinion about his opponent, and this allows him to subtly attack his opponents' reputation and character. William Lane Craig's Mytho-History vs. This syllogism can easily be applied to any god, since most, if not all, gods are said to be sentient in some form or fashion and because all referrals to reality attest that sentience does not arise without antecedent causation. Since his arguments for the Abrahamic god are extremely weak compared to his general arguments for a god, he never uses that line of argument against competent opponents like Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens, and only unleashes them against opponents who, at least in principle, believe in a higher power. Craig rejects the existence of actual infinities as being anywhere in nature as being an absurdity,[27] and yet he will cite singularity theorems from cosmologists while not mentioning to his audiences that a singularity, in physics, is an "actual infinite" (in particular, where the spacetime metric becomes infinite.) Alternately, even if we accept the extraordinary proposition without proof that Jesus did rise from the dead, as Craig says, that assumed fact does not lead to the conclusion that Jesus was divine or that God exists, as Christopher Hitchens has pointed out. Bible (which, for example, condones slavery), know God exists wholly apart from arguments simply by immediately experiencing Him, Certain intellectual questions have to receive certain answers, the cogency of Craig's brand of New Testament criticism, because he has some guilty secret to hide, doesn't want to repent and let Jesus run his life, will mysteriously start looking pretty good to him, though it seems valid in the eyes of the spectators. In my university speaking, I dont defend those doctrines because they are not essential to core Christianity. As a result, the work of Reasonable Faith has been appreciated by Christians of so many different confessions whether Protestant or Catholic or Orthodox or Coptic. For just one concrete example of why this is not a terribly good bullshit filter, try checking out McGrew & McGrew's. He parades himself as a philosopher, but none of the professors of philosophy whom I consulted had heard his name. DR. CRAIG: Now, that's said by a Young Earth Creationist. He holds all of these disparate disciplines accountable to the requirements of sound reasoning. It first of all asserts that causation is a real and objective feature of the world. At its heart, however, this is a variant of Craigs teleological argument as it follows the same line of claiming that because certain constants (or here, mathematical equations describing real world phenomena) exist, they must have been put in place by some sort of divine clockmaker. I can relate to your problems, Nathan, not only because of my Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome, but, even more relevantly, because I have struggled since my teen years with keratoconus, which finally necessitated corneal transplant surgery in 1993. May Gods strength be evident in you! Dear New Moms, isnt your baby giving you eye contact? If, by contrast, God says something is good because it is good, then there is an underlying assumption that there exists some moral standard that is independent from God. Craig is a big fan of straw manning opponents and likes to respond to them with an undertone of humour, thereby lessening the credibility of both. I have been ardent in my defense of the Christian doctrine of God and of the deity, substitutionary atonement, and resurrection of Christ, and of the necessity for repentant faith and being born again. This larger whole may be eternal, or may never have begun to exist, or caused the Big Bang (as a local inflationary expansion), or caused the rest of the multiverse. William Lane Craig Schooled Me On Evolution - Peaceful Science In Christ we have eternal life, redemption from our sins, and a relation to God, an incommensurable good. The program helped Craig to research and develop his knowledge about the subject of religion and the existence of God. He disses New Atheist authors such as Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris as: While Craig likes to boast that he is a "professional philosopher" and that he engages in "academic" debates which concentrate on the arguments, not on personalities, Craig has also stated that while Dawkins may be a good scientist, he is a "layman" in philosophy and theology and The God Delusion is a "very unsophisticated book. YouTuber A Roaming Freethinker (ne nooneleftalivekibo) has put together a list entitled The Strongest Case for William Lane Craig's Dishonesty[68] where Craig's versions of other scholars' opinions are contrasted with their actual words. William Lane Craig, a Christian philosophy professor at Houston Baptist University and Biola University's Talbot School of Theology, published the book "In Quest of the Historical Adam: A. I think that Molinism provides the best account of safeguarding both. , While he usually doesn't bring it up in his debates, Craig also defends Alvin Plantinga's modal version of the ontological argument for the existence of God. Want to Read. 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars. However, Craig goes out of his way to avoid controversy and seeks to appeal across denominational lines. See also this YouTube video by the aforementioned A Roaming Freethinker which contrasts Harris' words with Craig's misrepresentation as well as Harris subsequently calling out Craig's straw manning. Craig bases his conclusion that a supernatural divine intervention is the best explanation of the (supposed) resurrection of Jesus on four "facts":[52]. He has authored or edited over thirty books, including The Kalam Cosmological Argument; Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus; Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom; Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology; and God, Time and Eternity, as well as over a hundred articles in professional journals of philosophy and theology. I then came to appreciate the apostle Pauls words, when he wrote of his thorn in the flesh that plagued him: Three times I besought the Lord about this, that it should leave me; but he said to me, My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness. I will all the more gladly boast of my weaknesses, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. Dr Craig's Health Update | Reasonable Faith Podcast ReasonableFaithOrg 95.9K subscribers Subscribe 487 8.9K views 11 months ago #covid19 #coronavirus #williamlanecraig Dr. Craig talks about. Just as the late Duane Gish, Craig will insist that if his opponent doesn't address each of his claims and in the exact way Craig has defined them, the opponent will have conceded Craig's point. http://www.veritas.org/talks - What is Faith? If his opponent chooses to try to prove Craig's points, he can rebut them easily as he frames them in an extremely biased way which makes them difficult or impossible to support. One of Craig's online Q&As makes his mental contortions jarringly obvious. Knowledge about a 1-1 correspondence is required to grasp the concept of infinity. However, validity does not ensure soundness neither premise is well-supported. He is also a faculty professor at places like Houston Baptist University and Talbot school of theology. It is only because you are not consistent.". Craig was once touted by popular Atheist intellectual Sam Harris as the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheists. Though Craig is indeed most notable for being a Christian Apologist, he is a philosopher by trade.
Sanford, Florida Housing Authority, Nba Playoffs 2023 Standings, Articles W